Hi-ho, constant readers. I’m surfacing from two complex reference questions that have eaten up the bulk of my time this week. Believe me, that’s not a complaint. Puzzling over incomplete journal citations and poring over artists’ signatures in search of a match is my idea of a really good time. Yes, I am a huge library nerd. This brings me to the topic at hand, namely, Seth Godin’s recent blog post about expertise and passion. For those of you pressed for time, here’s the money quote:
It’s more important that you be passionate about what you do all day than it is to be passionate about the product that is being sold.
Swap out “service” for “product” and “provided” for “sold.” Then consider that statement again, as it pertains to your library. Is it true? If so, for all positions? If some positions are exempt from this, which ones, and why?
I’m a big believer in the notion that passion trumps expertise, because expertise can be cultivated over time. Passion, on the other hand, is something you either have or don’t, and if you don’t have it, nobody can give it to you. You have to find it for yourself.
Of course, far be it from me to knock expertise. I just don’t necessarily think it’s a function solely of longevity. In fact, without some passion to start with–or some that blossoms along the way, somehow–would you even stick around long enough to develop expertise?
As usual, more questions than answers, and your mileage will vary depending on what kind of library you work in, and the patrons you serve.
What do you think?