Alchemy by Numbers

A whimsical twist on the workday chronicles:

Number of library staff countywide registered for 23ThingsN@: 240. Eek! Pass the smelling salts…

Number of Twitter followers as of right now: 92

Number of Eleventh Stack visitors so far today: 114

Number of total visitors since the blog’s creation: 54,003.

Number of people registered for next week’s NetLibrary training sessions: 33

Number of nervous breakdowns I’ve had while planning those sessions: 19.

Number of awesome committee members I serve with who help me whenever I ask: 10 [did I mention we have the best committee in the whole county? :) ]

Number of exciting announcements I hope to be able to make very soon: 1

Number of things remaining on my to-do list: 145

Number of those things that can reasonably be accomplished before I go home today: 5

Number of meetings arranged this week: 2

Number of meetings that had to be arranged with multiple updates because Outlook is a royal pain in the nether quarters: 1

Number of e-mails in my in-box: 31

Number of things I’m avoiding: 1

Number of hours of OTR I need to burn: 11

Number I’ve scheduled: 7.5

Number of books I promised to review: 6

Number of books I’ve actually finished reviewing: 2

Number of questions I’ve tried to answer on VR this shift, but haven’t snapped up fast enough: 4

Number of questions successfully answered on VR today: 1

Number of librarians currently staffing AskHere PA: 34

Number of additional projects I’m considering taking on: 1

Number of people who will be needed to talk me out of it: 7

Number of library blogs to which I subscribe: 12

Number of non-library tech blogs to which I subscribe: 1

Number of reference questions worked on this week: 3

Number of hours invested in those questions so far: 4

Number of questions for which the answer was easily available online, and deliverable within 48 hours: 0

There you have it. If you wrote up your work day in numbers, what would it look like?

Technology Playground Post-Mortem

Yesterday everyone who worked so hard to put together the Technology Playground program showed up to make it happen. The day of a program, especially one you’ve helped plan for months, is both exciting and nerve-wracking, particularly when the fire alarm goes off five minutes before said program is set to begin.

[For the record, I refuse to believe that our balloons had anything to do with that! Sensors my left foot. Luckily it was all over quickly! :) ]

The team is going to meet sometime soon to do an official post-mortem, Monday-morning-quarterbacking, best practices type of meeting, to talk about what worked, and what didn’t. Best of all, we’re going to talk about what we’ll do differently when we do this again in the fall, because the powers that be felt we’d made a good start.

It sounds so simple in hindsight, but it really involved a lot of thought and care on behalf of almost every single department here at Main. We had ten stations scattered throughout the library. At each station, staff members would demonstrate a different technology. At one station, for example, you could learn how to download audio and video. At another, a librarian talked about our virtual reference services. We had gaming, genealogy databases, and even a microfilm demonstration – just because it’s an older technology at which some people scoff doesn’t mean it’s quite dead yet, especially when even Google News Archives only carries our paper of record back to about 1946, as far as I can tell.

At any rate, a lot of stuff going on. Wes R. and I staffed the social networking station, and talked to patrons about our blogs and Twitter accounts. Rather than give a formal presentation, we kept our demo conversational, had handouts, and responded to people’s questions on-the-fly, a tactic that allowed us to talk about other things of interest to patrons too.

As people visited each station, we punched their registration ticket. Three punches earned them a CLP pencil and an entry for the prize drawing. With ten punches they got a CLP tote bag and drawing entry. The prizes were four gift cards from Best Buy, in increasing amounts – we’ll be drawing for those next week, once we catch our breath and get our bearings.

We haven’t done a final count yet, either, of all the forms we got, but we know that 60 came through registration. This is not an accurate final tally because–clever folk that we are–we put registration forms at each station. That way, if somebody just happened to be in the library and wanted to participate, they could start at any station. I’m guessing the final count will be around 75; not too shabby for a gorgeous, sunny Saturday at the end of finals week in our library’s neighborhood!

Since I was here yesterday, and I’m here today, I made sure to schedule tomorrow off so I could get a break. Also, it’s my birthday, and while I love both you and library science madly, there are limits to what an alchemist will do for her profession. :)

Take care, and we’ll talk later this week.

Alchemical Advocacy

An advocacy page has appeared on the CLP website, designed to let patrons know how the proposed state budget cuts could affect their library system.

This makes me happy and sad. Happy that the site exists, sad that it needs to be there. But libraries all over the country are experiencing tough times – it would be sheer folly to assume Allegheny County would be any different.

I don’t speak the language of numbers and budgets all that fluently, and I’m certainly not an official channel for information about my organization. I can tell you that I love this pile of bricks wtih all my heart, from the antique glass in the stacks (1895, yo) to the marble staircases with their grooved steps that indicate how many people have come and gone here, in pursuit of knowledge or fun. And because I love it, I hate to see it suffer.

I imagine, sometimes, all the patrons from 1895, 1914, 1945, 1969, milling around me while I work, as if their essences lingered. I especially think of August Wilson, who, though his true home was the Hill District, got a portion of his self-education here at Main after he quit high school. It’s a great story, and you can read more about it here.

So, yes, I’m a little more fanciful than budget-minded (though I do seem to have a knack for balancing my book budget). Maybe that’s because I believe that people and service come first…but I’m aware that money is needed to support both. Thank goodness for all those folks listed in the sidebar of that advocacy page – they’re working just as hard at their job (financials) as we public service folk are at ours, I reckon…

Back to work. I’ll be in touch.

Results of Slow Reading Raffle

Just a quick note to congratulate Laura, who won the raffle for my review copy of Slow Reading – I’ll be getting in touch with you shortly to arrange the send.

If you didn’t win, fret not: I’m reviewing things all the darned time, and there just isn’t room in my house for all the copies. So, stay tuned! For this particular series of reviews, I’m making my way through Library Juice Concentrate, but I’m also writing up something new for Litterbox Magazine – it’s nice to be asked back!

Back to the Whartonesque whirlwind. Anybody who read that word as “Whedonesque,” it’s time for your coffee break. :)

Snippets from the A-Team

And by “A-Team,” I mean, of course, Team Alchemy.  I just love it when a plan comes together, though, and many things have blossomed this week.  Here’s a short progress report.

Collection Development

Got a compliment today – it was passed down from the coordinator of collection development, who appreciates the way Bonnie and I have worked out the ordering of pop culture/current events non-fiction. That’s really gratifying to hear, because we spend a lot of time making sure we’re not duplicating orders! Our LibraryThing account helps, and the rest of the staff in both our departments have been gracious about using it.

Refdesk

The question du jour concerned Slavic mythology. Do we have the best career, or what?

Virtual Reference

There’s a lot of rhetoric floating around about best practices and whatnot, so I’ll not dwell on this overmuch. Suffice to say, I think virtual reference is splendid for developing writing skills, and learning to adapt the reference interview to a text-based process is a never-ending course in professional development.

Of course, it’s also subject to Murphy’s Law: if I start conducting a reference interview, the patron asks for just a few quick links. If I start with links, the patron invariably reveals more info that cries for a reference interview. Definitely educational. :)

Eleventh Stack

In March the Eleventh Stack blog earned a record-high number of hits, and so far this year monthly visits are double those from 2008. On March 25th we were featured as one of WordPress’s top 100 growing blogs. Granted, we were only #98, but given how many WordPress blogs there are, I think that’s a pretty cool feat!

CLPicks

As of right now we’re up to 81 followers on Twitter, and our TwitterGrade has risen to 85. Again, not too shabby for a ragtag team of librarians trying something new. A goodish chunk of our followers are local people, too, not just my librarian friends/colleagues. Whew. :)

23 Things

Team Celery Stick (a subsidiary of Team Alchemy) opened up registration yesterday for our “23 Things ‘N ‘At” program – in one day we received 110 registrants countywide, so the bar is up there pretty high! Kelley, Ryan, Beth and I have risen to the occasion by setting up our wiki, creating the official program blog, and putting the final touches on our content.

Databases (CLP)

Working on 1st-quarter stats. Also spent some time doing scenario planning, in case of material budget cuts. It’s better to plan for things and not need them then vice versa, IMHO. And it’s a good exercise in seeing where you’re strong, collectionwise, in what formats.

Databases (countywide)

With much help from the committee, have set up four trainings for our suite of NetLibrary recorded books. They’ve just changed the interface and added iPod-compatible titles (hurray!), so we want to make sure the various libraries’ staffs are up to speed.

There’s more, but I think that’s enough for now. If I told you everything I did all day, you wouldn’t believe me! Although I wish I got more reference desk time, I’m really happy to be part of all the things I do on the daily. I definitely stretched out of my comfort zone with this job, and it’s taken me to places I never imagined I’d go.

From clerking to reader’s advisory librarian to nominal 2.0 person/reference librarian in 7 short years. Who knows what will happen next? It’s pretty exciting…

At any rate, I’ll be back next week with the results of the drawing for Slow Reading. Hope you all had a wonderful National Library Week!

Book Review: Slow Reading

First in an occasional series of reviews for books published by Library Juice Press and/or Litwin Books. These are volunteer reviews, written gratis, done in the interest of getting coverage for library issues and publications that don’t always get as much professional press as they should.  Any omissions or errors are my own, and do not reflect the intentions of either the author or the publisher.  As ever, though, I pull no punches, but call ‘em like I see ‘em.

The Book:

Miedema, John. Slow Reading. Duluth, MN: Litwin Books, 2009. 78 pg. ISBN: 978-0-9802004-4-7. $12.00.

Summary:

In five short chapters/essays, Miedema defines slow reading and mounts a cogent defense of it in the face of technological advances that frequently predict the death of print.  Stressing the need for multiple reading experiences and ways of learning, Miedema’s short, yet powerful, book, should be required reading for library school students and library management who do not hold the MLIS, and have therefore been removed from the professional discourse around ways of reading and service to readers.

Analysis:

Face it:  if you had a dollar for every time you heard one of the technorati say that “print is dead”, you’d be able to thumb your nose at your 403(b) and set sail for the sun-drenched island of your choice.  Alas, until now, the response to such a deeply ignorant statement has been the sputtering incoherence of thousands of library workers who know better, but can’t cogently explain why because we’re too busy picking our jaws up off the floor or scraping our exploded brains off the ceiling. 

Thanks to John Miedema, those of us who recognize and advocate the value of books and paper now have a catchphrase of our own, a scholarly framework within which to compose our arguments, and a physical object to wave in the faces of those who would march us off to twopointopia willy-nilly.  “Slow reading,” a term grounded in the same ideology that informed the Slow Movement, is defined and contextualized by a body of scholarship from library science as well as literary criticism, and exemplifies a middle way that acknowledges various ways of reading and meaning-making in a calm, reasonable fashion.

Chapter highlights and key talking points include:

  • The roles of pleasure and comprehension in reading
  • The role of readers’ advisory, charmingly called “an uncertainty principle of library science.”
  • The truth behind such myths as “the paperless office” and the ways in which digital technologies have caused various aspects of the traditional library to thrive rather than perish.
  • Specific features and processes that distinguish reading print from reading online.
  • “E-books as metadata for print books” [a personal favorite section here - reviewer = biased]
  • A short history of the Slow Movement and its implications for reading and libararies.
  • Bibliotherapy in the context of “The Psychology of Slow Reading” [another underappreciated aspect of reading, IMHO]
  • Tips for becoming a slow reader [this short section could, and probably should, become its own book].

One of my greatest fears about librarianship is that we’re in danger, as a profession, of throwing the baby out with the bathwater.  One of my frustations with our profession is that those people with opposing viewpoints or alternative solutions express themselves either so stridently that their opponents cannot find an entry point, or so quietly that their voices go entirely undetected.  Slow Reading strikes the perfect balance between these two extremes with credible scholarship and a concerned, yet measured, tone that allows the reader to accept Miedema’s arguments and weigh them against his/her own personal and professional experience.  This book is an essential purchase for library science curricula as well as public libraries in communities where one can obtain an MLIS.  It is also strongly recommended for medium-to-large academic libraries with strong programs in the humanities, as much of the research here will interest scholars in that discipline. 

In fact, I believe in this book so much that I will gladly share my galley with one lucky Alchemy reader who wants to learn more.  If you leave a comment on this entry between now and 4/16, you will be entered into a drawing to receive my review copy, gratis.  In fact, I’ll even pay for postage if you happen to be a faraway librarian.  Sorry, though – I can only make this offer to one reader – as the old-school record commercials used to say, if you don’t win, “You’ll have to get your own.”

Next regular update will be a project update and possible commentary on the astonishing head-scratcher of a National Library Week that’s off and running with a bang (Amazon FAIL) and a whimper (RIP Judith Krug :( ).

Dreaming the Library (professional reading)

This month’s professional pick was Matthew Kelly’s The Dream Manager. It was pure serendipity that I’ve been reading this at the same time the Darien and Taiga statements came out – I don’t plan these things, but they seem to work out that way. Such is alchemy. :)

The Dream Manager is an extended parable about a janitorial company that suffered from high turnover costs, and how it turned that trend around by investing in its employees and their dreams. Step by step we see how a company can go from struggling to amazing by treating its human resources like, well, resourceful humans. Here’s the money quote:

In our corporate dealings, let us never forget that it is people who drive every business and organization. On both sides of every transaction, we find people. It is, therefore, people who decide whether organizations will be successful or unsuccesful…and people have dreams.

I know I’ve probably lost one or two of you by now, if the very word “dream” didn’t scare you off already. But, as with all things, there’s a middle ground to dreaming. Far too much of library rhetoric is composed of either pie-in-the-sky speculation that doesn’t take the reality of the human condition into account, or extreme cynicism that blows apart any glimmer of hope anyone has to offer because what’s the use of trying and who needs an MLIS and by the way we’re all going to die broke and homeless, so, whatever.

But library workers are in a unique position to leverage the power of dreaming, because what do we do all day already? We help people achieve their dreams. We help the woman working on her resume, or the proud grandpa learning to e-mail pictures of his grandchildren to far-away friends, or the student who has to write a critical paper on “A Rose for Emily.” Library workers connect people with the information needed to achieve their dreams, tall or small.

[Because people are people, they sometimes don't behave very well. But, I've found, usually there's a frustrated dream behind that bad behavior. Life does not deal all of us the same cards, and while that is not an excuse to behave poorly, it is a reason. If you can ferret out the goal behind the frustration, and maybe remove the barriers to the dream, you might get somewhere. Just a theory.]

So, we’re all pretty well acquainted with patrons’ dreams. What if we approached our own dreams, and those of our peers, with the same attention and respect? If everybody in your organization felt valued and appreciated as a human being, with a backstory and outside interests, and goals and objectives, and, well, dreams, can you imagine?

Of course, it’s not enough to have the dreams. You have to have a plan to back it up. One major reason dreaming is frowned upon is because there’s no plan and no accountability. Enter the Dream Manager, the person in your organization who functions as a coach to help you achieve your dreams. This could be an official, separate position. It could be an additional task that a manager takes upon him/herself. It could be an extremely informal thing that a bunch of individuals within an organization decides to do, in the attempt to support each other. The important part is that there’s somebody there to bounce your dreams off of, who will give you constructive criticism and help you form a plan.

Now, honestly, if you knew somebody was going to listen to you seriously, and help you achieve your best self, wouldn’t you respond by working your little heart out? I know I would! This book is recommended for library managers, people who think they might want to be library managers, and front-line staff looking for a glimmer of hope. I would also like to challenge the cynics to read this one, too, and see if it’s realistic enough for them. As a confirmed “show me” skeptic, I think it will hold up well, but I’d like to hear from some bona fide gloom cookies. :)

What’s your take on dreams? Do you have a mentor, manager, or co-worker you could trust with your dreams? What could your organization acheive if there were a mechanism for people to grow their dreams in a realistic way?

I’ll tell you my dreams if you’ll tell me yours….

Peace, Love and Progressive Librarianship

I had a few blog post drafts in the hopper, but I’ve deleted all of them. Given the events of this past weekend here in Pittsburgh, to say nothing of the multiple murders committed in Binghamton, NY; Tacoma, WA; and, sadly, far too many other places lately, writing about library issues seems, well, trivial.

I know this is false, but I don’t seem to have the words to express how I’m feeling about our profession, and its role in helping the world become more peaceful, less violent. Talking about this sort of thing is, Elvis Costello help us, like dancing about architecture.

Fortunately, Nick Lowe has already written the theme song for all of us who proudly consider ourselves “regressive” librarians (the AL can bite me), so we shall give him the bulk of the words and sentiments for the day.

Never doubt, progressive librarians, that your efforts to build a safer, saner world through socially responsible programming and collection development will someday prevail. Perhaps it’s idealistic folly, but I have to believe that statement. The alternatives strike me as decidedly unpalatable.

The personal is political. Librarianship is political. What are you doing to create a more socially just world in your library?

ETA: When you wear your heart on your sleeve, your librarianship occasionally slips. Many thanks to DW for the corrective. :)