The People in My Neighborhood

At one point last Friday, I noticed that my work badge had gone AWOL.

Given that staff need this badge to get into the building, and are supposed to wear it at all times per the rules, this was a touch inconvenient.  Expensive, too, as replacement badges cost $25 a pop.  That’s an awful lot of large regular coffees in the LAV world.

To make matters worse, when I went down to get a replacement badge, I discovered that the badge-maker was broken.   While temporarily saving me $25, this meant I would have to spend the rest of the week depending on the kindness of colleagues to swipe me in every morning until the machine was repaired.

At least, that was the case until the phone rang, and the delightful C., from the Penn Hills library, informed me that somehow my badge had ended up at their library.  Apparently, your absent-minded alchemist had used her own badge as a bookmark, forgotten that she’d done so, and then returned the library book with the badge in it.

Double yoi!

Just one more anecdote from library hijinks in America’s most livable city.  I swear, I could copy out daily events in a notebook, type it up in script form, and sell it to HBO as their next big hit.  It would have to be HBO, of course, because of the cussing, although the ideal situation would be to get into a bidding war with HBO and Showtime.   Oh, and Felicity Huffman plays me, or it’s no go.

I must confess, I feel just a teensy bit guilty about the amount of time I spend laughing.  And I wonder if I’m really the only person to whom amusing things happen, or who is surrounded by smart, funny people who say witty things in Sorkinesque patter.  That doesn’t sound quite right, and yet, I don’t really see a lot of evidence that anybody else in library science is having a good time.  And I mean “a good time despite the fact that library world is falling apart” not “la la la I can’t hear you I’m having a good time.”

There is, you see, a diference.  Laughter, happiness, and positive thinking don’t, if you use them correctly, obliterate the fact that libraries are in a world of hurt right now.  They do, however, coat those bitter pills with enough honey so we don’t have to choke on them.  A little sweetness can go a long way toward firing you up to carry on, if you let it.

I get such sweetness here. 

If you’re reading Eleventh Stack, you already know a lot about some of my co-workers, based on what they choose to reveal about themselves in the library blog.  If you’re not yet reading it, click here to read the contributor bios, so you can make up your mind whether or not you want to know them (and, by extension, all of us) a little better.

Starting a blog was one of the smartest things we’ve done recently, not only because it is an excellent way to promote the library, but because it gives the staff a voice, and reveals a human element that is often obscured in a large organization.  That’s not a pejorative; it’s just what happens.  Library directors still skeptical about blogging may want to take note of that.

And they’ve used their voices for good, this team of blogonauts, as they like to call themselves.  They write well, and they make the library look good.  They understand the delicate balance between the personal and the professional.  When it comes to advocacy, they know how to fire people up without ticking them off.  And, occasionally, they make me mist up, as I did while reading Wes’s recent essay, On Babies and Bebop.

There are others in local library land who prefer to keep a lower profile, either because they don’t think they’re good writers (they’re wrong), believe they have nothing to say (also wrong), or simply do not wish to have an internet presence (choose privacy!).  Some of them may be anxiously perched on the edge of their chairs, reading carefully to see whether or not I’m going to “out” them.  Relax, dears – your secrets are safe with me. 

I will say, only, that this space, from the basement to the rafters, is filled with marvelous people who make a difference in so many ways, every day.  Often their work is invisible to the public, as it is with the small army of people who stoop and stretch for hours, pulling holds and trundling them off to where they need to go.  It is not, I assure you, elves that keep the floors clean, the coffee brewing, or the hallways secured.  Nor is it fairies who balance the books and write the grants, though their work, admittedly, often does seem downright magical to me (numbers, alas, frequently do not add up in the LAV world).  Preservation, conservation, transportation, and much more go on here; like instruments in a symphony, each person brings his or her melody to the whole, and the whole sounds like – with apologies to  Julie — awesome.

On top of being great library workers, they’re just plain nice people.  People who see you walking and offer you rides to, or from, work.  People who lend you umbrellas when it’s raining, or buy you lunch without wanting reciprocation.  People who volunteer to be your personal thrift store shopper (seriously).  People who read great books, and recommend them.  People who peel you off the ceiling when you’re freaking out about something, and trust you enough to confide in you in return.  People who rejoice with you, and with whom you rejoice, when things go well.  People who listen patiently while you muse aloud for the fiftieth time about some random philosophical thing on your mind.  People who actually stop typing and turn away from their computer keyboards to give you their full attention.  People who make you baby cockroaches out of book tape (You know you’re jealous and want one.  Admit it.).

It’s not all wine and roses, though, and we’re no angels.  A large, diverse staff means, of necessity, that there are going to be differences of opinion on everything under the sun, mismatches in communication style, and accidental hurt feelings all the darned time.   But we  try to give each other the benefit of the doubt, and we fight fair.  Some of the people I respect and admire most around here are the people who drive me the craziest, because they tell me what they really think instead of what they think I want to hear, and they’re ever-present reminders that there are other ways to look at the world than mine.  They choose the authentic rather than the easy, and they chellenge me to live up to my own personal code of moral/ethical conduct every day.

In fact, I think the only thing that really bums me out about working here is, sometimes, our size.  Unless you’ve got meetings with them, it’s possible to go an entire year without seeing someone who works in a branch.  It frequently takes an extra effort just to see somebody who works on a different floor, which is another excellent reason to use those morning and afternoon breaks for walks around the building.   You really have to be pro-active if you want to get to know people; luckily, my efforts to get to know other people in the system and understand what they do have mostly borne positive fruit.

This brings us back to my peers at Penn Hills, who did me a solid, even though I don’t really know them at all.  Pittsburgh’s pretty transit-friendly, but it’s still not possible to get everywhere just yet.  On top of that, Pittsburgh is very “neighborhoody,” so everything I’ve described above about CLP and Oakland is completely inapplicable to Moon Township, which is itself different from Green Tree, which is different from Oakmont, and so on.  I pick those particular libraries as examples because I”ve actually been fortunate enough to get to know and work with their directors, somewhat; there aren’t a lot of opportunities for that, beside committee work, unless you live in one of those communities.   And yet, somehow, between the countywide listserv, the various committee meetings, and the social bonds we’ve forged both digitally and IRL, we make it all work, somehow.

It takes an awful lot of manure to grow a rose, and if I am at all a librarian  worth knowing, it’s because my character has been molded, shaped, and influenced by the professional company I keep.  I wanted to make sure that at least one entry in my professional blog was dedicated to giving them their due, even at the expense of Constant Reader rolling his/her eyes at The Hokiness.   They deserve more money and more vacation time, but all I can offer them is my love, respect, and cookies.  It will have to suffice.  I suppose it would probably help if I toned down the acerbic wit and rapid-fire snark from time to time, but I can always put that in my goals and objectives for next year.

See?  Loving your fellow man doesn’t have to be all magical unicorns and “Kumabaya.”  What do you love about your library?  Your co-workers?  Do you have people in your professional life who simply rock your library world?  Here’s your chance to brag on them, via the comments.  And if this post inspires you to write your own essay about the library where you work, I would love to see a link.

Reading Today: The Happiness Project, Gretchen Rubin.   A writer decides she would like to be happier, structures a year-long program to boost her happiness, and offers suggestions on how you can do the same (non-fiction, self-help).

Next up, a pensée, after which we move to the next-most-popular poll topic.  Two topics actually tied for second place, so I will probably flip a coin before choosing my next subject.

Housekeeping/Book-keeping

Life here at Alchemy isn’t all vampires and snark.  It is, however, rather bookish.

I’m somewhat startled by how infrequently I talk about books in my professional librarian blog.  Then again, my writing about books would be much like asking fish to philosophize about water (especially since fish can’t talk).  Print books, to me, are not so much objects to be fussed over as they are critical elements of survival that I take for granted.  The sun will rise in the morning, the water that comes out of my tap will be potable, and there will always, always be something for me to read.  You will step between me and my books at your peril, and you will pry their papery goodness from my cold, dead hands.

All that being said, I’ve decided we don’t talk about books nearly enough at Alchemy, and that this must change.  Given that I am still my department’s emerging technologies librarian, we will still grumble talk a lot about technology.  Because I’m now officially in the leadership training cohort, we’ll still be talking about leadership.  And because I remain your cynical romantic, we will definitely still philosophize.  There are, however, one or two little cosmetic tweaks we’ll make going forward.

For starters, at the end of every post, I’ll link to the book I’m reading that day.  Given that I am usually reading 50 library books at any given time, and have 50 more on order, this should not prove difficult.  In all fairness, I am usually reading more than one book per day (one for the bus, one for each room in the house, one for my lunch break, etc.), but to keep the literary insufferability to a minimum, we’ll stick to one per post.

Finishing books tends to be an issue for me.  I take Nancy Pearl’s 50-page rule very seriously; it breaks my heart that, at the end of my life, I still won’t have read all the books on earth, so I want to make sure I don’t spend too much time with clunkers.  50 pages is more than enough to be able to file it away in my brain for readers’ advisory.

Still, I’d like to finish more books than I do, which is why I signed up for two reading challenges this year, a 50-book challenge at GoodReads, and a 100 book challenge at Every Girl Blog. That’s technically 150 books to finish this year (doubling up seems like cheating), and I’m going to keep track of them right here at Alchemy, just to save time.  You will find my 2010 reading log thus far in the left-hand sidebar, or you can visit it here.

You’d think we would be all booked up right now, but you’d be so very wrong!  Just to up the ante, starting with the next book I finish, I’m going to review it here at Alchemy.  I love writing book reviews, and would like to get both more exposure and more practice.  The 175-word fiction reviews I produce for Library Journal are definitely fun, and keep me sharp, but I find that, much like the opium addicts of old, it takes more and more of the stuff to satisfy my critical appetite.  Since it would be selfish to sign up to review all the books at LJ, I’ll simply have to branch out.

What else is in it for you, Constant Reader?  Well, those ARCs have to go somewhere when I’m done with them, and I’d prefer it not be the recycling pile.  The sensible, responsible thing to do seems to be passing them on to a fellow information professional.  Ergo, each time I’m done with an LJ ARC, I’ll offer it up for grabs on Alchemy.

As luck would have it, I actually have one for you today – everybody who comments on this entry between now and Wednesday April 28th will have the opportunity to win the somewhat-battered copy of the book I’ve just reviewed.  Today’s mystery ARC is the third novel from a literary mystery author, and if you’re in the mood for a solid whodunit with a number of quirky literary style choices and a meta-fiction vibe, you should put your hat in the ring for it.

In a token nod to technology, I’ve updated my blogroll to indicate which library blogs I’m actually reading right now.  I don’t read many blogs, sad to say; this is not because I don’t love you madly, but because I loathe squinting at a tiny screen.  Because printing out posts is neither time-efficient nor environmentally sound, I limit my blog reading only to those authors who make it consistently worth my while.   Paradoxically, however, I am always on the lookout for blogs I haven’t yet discovered, and it seems sensible that I should start with you.  Ergo, if you are blogging, please include your link so that I can repay your kindness to me by checking out your thoughts as well.

Last, but certainly not least, a feature for the comment-shy:  WordPress has just initiated a delightful new star rating system, allowing you to indicate how much you liked a particular post without having to leave a comment.  I’ve enabled this feature, and you will now see it at the top of every post.  The only way I’m going to get better at this is if you give me feedback, so please, for the sake of quality control, make your (dis)pleasure known ad astra if you’re not feeling chatty.

Poll results indicate the bulk of you are interested in hearing about My Year of No, a project that began on Facebook.  When I come back from my “nobody should work on their birthday” mini-holiday, I’ll tell you all about it…at least, all about the professional aspect.

Happy reading!

Reading Today: This is for the Mara Salvatrucha, Samuel Logan.  A gang member turned informant spills the beans on the MS-13, one of America’s most notorious street gangs (non-fiction, true crime).

Title Fail (Insert Vampire Metaphor Here): Library Failure, Pt. IV

A/k/a “Part the Last.”  Honestly, I don’t know how Dickens managed this whole serialization thing. Romance at short notice is more my specialty.

Besides, we have to finish this series before you start accusing me of making up failures and blunders to suit the topic.  Truth always being funnier than fiction, however, it probably makes sense to you that, as I’ve been typing this and helping various patrons, I also managed to spill half a bottle of water all over myself.

This would not be so bad if I were wearing my usual black attire.  Today, however, I opted for the knee-high, fire-engine red sheath dress that looks so fetching with my black labcoat and pirate boots.   The resulting wet-dark splotches make me look like a badly bruised tomato, and have prompted at least two patrons to ask me if I have enough sense to come in out of the rain.

Sigh.

If only to stop attracting failure, then, let’s get this over and done with!

The Non-Verbal Approach

Logically, you know that screwing up at work doesn’t make you a bad person, because everybody does it.  And, logically, you know you’re supposed to forgive yourself, laugh it off, rub some dirt in it, and take a lap.  Because of your pesky brain chemistry, however, logic is not always going to work.  In fact, the more you try to logic yourself into getting over it, the worse you are likely to feel, because you’re trying to solve a right-brain problem with a left-brain approach.

Belleruth Naparstek figured this out while working with trauma survivors.  The lightbulb went on with one client in particular, whose repeated verbalization of her trauma increased, rather than decreased, her symptoms of upset.  Non-verbal techniques, however, such as visualization, guided imagery, and meditation led to a decrease in suffering for the patient and a whole new path of therapeutic exploration for Naparstek.

Now, with the exception of those rare days when somebody ODs on heroin in the library bathroom, you could argue that working in our profession is not traumatic; it simply feels that way sometimes.  And remember, to your amygdala, it doesn’t matter whether or not the trauma is real or imagined.  So if you’re having a bad day of any sort, you might want to consider tricking yourself back into sanity with a visualization, or a meditation.

If you found yourself rolling your eyes at the prospect, it’s possibly because you think I expect you to imagine, say, fields of wildflowers, with chirping little birds flitting past, and perhaps a fuzzy, snuggly bunny rabbit you can cuddle until you feel better.  Those of you who would feel cheered by an interlude with a bunny can hold that image, close your eyes and stop here.

The rest of us are going to do some Lincoln thinking.

Lincoln = Failure?

One exceptionally annoying aspect of the internet is the way truth and fiction meet,  have a few cocktails, and impulsively take off together on an ill-advised, whirlwind tour of your e-mail.  Case in point:  the e-mail foward that praises Abraham Lincoln for his persistence in the face of repeated failure.  The good folks at Snopes have written a meticulous, point-by-point refutation that elucidates just what is, and is not, true about that e-mail forward.  Emotionally, however, it is very satisfying to have an image of somebody larger-than-life who triumphed over adversity to cling to, especialy when we are having a bad day.

Given that we are librarians, however, our logical brains are harder to outfox.  We want order and structure, organization and classification, gosh darn it.  Ergo, our mythic, symbolic figures have to be ridiuclously, outrageously mythic and symbolic in order to sidestep our strong natural tendencies.

Good thing we’ve got some pop culture options to pick from.  Enter Seth Grahame-Smith, who turned our sixteenth president into a vampire hunter, and the warped gang at Kill Vampire Lincoln Productions, who turned him into an undead abomination.  Read each visualization scenario, then decide which symbol works best for you and find a private place to soothe your amygdala.

Visualization #1:  Abraham Lincoln As Vampire Hunter

If you cottoned to the previously-suggested notion that library failure is like a confidence-draining vampire, you might want to focus on bloodsucker-battling Abraham Lincoln as your symbol of sanity. 

Close your eyes, breathe deeply, and imagine the tall, lanky statesman gravely planting a stake right through the heart of your failure-paralysis.  Relish the thought of those spindly arms scything the heck out of the terrible demon that prevents you from becoming your professional best!  Savor the feelings of liberty that kick in as the eloquent Gettysburg addresser calmly bids your fears depart this mortal plane, and return to the unholy realms of their origin, hastening their departure with a ginormous flask of holy water to the face!  Finally, when your fears have been vanquished, don’t forget to shake hands with Mr. Lincoln and say thank you – good manners are always in fashion, no matter how silly the scenario.  Open your eyes, ignore the slackjawed stares of your compatriots, and resume your normal workday duties.

Visualization #2:  Abraham Lincoln as Vampire

It’s perfectly possible some of you might find the previous symbolic stance — as well as most of this series — both rabidly anti-vampire and insensitive to the rights of the undead.  Because Alchemy strives for inclusivity off all kinds, I offer this second visualization in which things take a somewhat different turn.

Close your eyes and breathe deeply.  Imagine that you are growing taller, sprouting absurdly long incisors, growing an astonishingly thick and lavish beard.  Picture your clothes melting and reconstituting themselves into the form of a really striking black suit, complete with tall stovepipe hat.  Feel the preternatural strength in your vampire veins as you consider your prey, all those petty, annoying fears that keep you from achieving your full potential.  Use your amped-up, immortal laser-beam eyes to fix them in place, and stare them down like the puny, pathetic little rabbits they are.  See them grow smaller, trembling in fear at your obvious might, and cover in the face of your bloodthirsty rage!  Now pounce on the little rodents and administer righteous justice!  Mwahahahahahaha!

Remember that you are a scholar and a gentleperson, and slowly watch what remains of your fears dissolve into nothingness.  Count backwards from 100 until you reach 1, at which point you will, hopefully, have recovered your equilibrium.  Take one, last deep breath, then open your eyes, ignore the horrified stares of your co-workers, and resume your normal duties.

Post-Visualization Analysis

Once you’ve managed to convince your supervisor not to shoot you full of Thorazine and lock you away, ask yourself these questions:

  1. Am I willing to take risks and be a little silly for the sake of my mental health and well-being?
  2. Am I courageous enough to consider that perhaps I take myself and my responsibilities just a teensy bit too seriously at times?
  3. If the whole vampire thing didn’t work for me, am I open to creating visualizations around alternatives that I personally find appealing?
  4. Do I hide my true personality and character behind a calm, sedate professional mask?  Do my co-workers know who I am as a person, or do they only see a polished exterior?
  5. How come Library Alchemy gets to be silly and I don’t?

That last is a trick question – you have a right, nay, a duty, to be as silly as possible whenever necessary and appropriate.  What makes you laugh?  What images would get you through a crazy, failure-swamped day at your library?  What is the appropriate balance of personal and professional in your office?  How personal can you get before your peers recoil in horror?  How do you and your officemates keep yourselves sane?

I ask myself these questions a lot.  I also ask myself why I’m still sitting here when I should be on the other side of the work-life balance hyphen!  To be fair, it was quite busy at the desk this afternoon, and that simply must take priority.  I will, however, be back when I can, to do a bit of housekeeping, and then to write about the topic you chose in the last Alchemy poll.  If you haven’t yet voted, you’ve got one more chance.

 A bientot, chers colleagues.  Stay strong, but stay silly too.

Title Fail (Insert Vampire Metaphor Here): Library Failure, Pt. III

Here we are again, leading by example, coming up for air to talk a little more about failure.  Like, for example, my failure to keep a straight face yesterday at the reference desk when a patron’s cell phone rang.

Though I’m no Lady GaGa, I’m pretty good with the public service poker face when the occasion warrants.  Yesterday, however, I couldn’t remain composed when the cellphone ringing started.  You see, Constant Reader, the sound that played at intervals without ceasing was…

…a crowing rooster.  Sort of like this, only without the heavy metal riffing in the background.

Put yourself in my place for a moment.  In the peace and splendor of a steady, yet quiet, tour of reference desk duty, your composure is marred by

COCK A DOODLE DOO!  COCK A DOODLE DOO!

Every 30 seconds.  With the patron showing no signs of having heard the sound, or wanting to do anything about it.  And you, enforcer of the policy which clearly states that cellphones should be taken out into the hallway, cannot enforce it, becuase you have your head tucked into your hand, suppressing violent giggles.  Other patrons are looking at you, waiting for you to take charge of the situation, because you are the arbiter of order.  And yet, there you sit, turning purple from suppressed mirth.

Rooster.  Ringtone.  Professional.  Response.  Fail.

How my desk partner managed to get through it with a straight face, I’ll never know.  Perhaps he’ll consent to giving me lessons in future?  Or, perhaps, I should heed my own advice and see what science has to say about outsmarting my brain, so that I, too, can remain calmer in the face of mayhem?

Science!

 There’s no dearth of recent books ready to help you tame your amygdala.  Many of them cite the same scientific sources, so here, pulled at random, is a capsule description of what happens in your brain when the amygdala freaks out:

The Fear Response stimulates the amygdala-hippocampus complex (AHC), your emotional response center and the primitive part of the brain, often called the “lizard brain.” The lizard brain directs the emotions or behaviors that are responsible for survival of the species, such as fear and aggression. The lizard brain also stores the memory of any given negative experience or threat so that you can react even faster to it in the future.

Stimulation of the lizard brain triggers a cascade of events, culminating in the production of hormones and peptides, such as cortisol and adrenaline, that cause physical changes in the body. At the same time, changes occur in the brain that prevent you from doing any complex problem solving–you actually revert to a more primitive being whose main goal is physical self-preservation.

The Love Response, Eva M, Selhub, pg. 5

So, a chemical process that once might have saved you from being saber-toothed tiger chow now has the potential to trip you up by spurring you into fear-driven actions and responses that have the potential to become a negative feedback loop. What’s a librarian to do?

In a word, laugh.

There’s virtually no end to the veritable flood of information out there about the science of laughter. Robert Provine, a key scholar in the field, has generated a great deal of research on the topic, including a lengthy essay in American Scientist.  The bottom line appears to be that laughter is adaptive, is good for us, makes us healthier overall.  Which means that my giggle-fit “fail” at the reference desk yesterday wasn’t so much a “fail” as it was the best possible response to a fairly ludicrous situation.

That lets me off the hook quite nicely!  You, however, may be skeptical.  You would be perfectly within your rights to scowl at your screen, cross your arms and say, “Listen girlfiend, you’re not here, and you don’t know.”  Your library, you may reckon, is no laughing matter.  No amount of snicker-inducing shenanigans could possibly improve your current working conditions, could they?

Well, allow me to retort.  In part IV, I will attempt to sidestep the logical part of your brain and appeal to those parts of it that respond best to myth and symbol, via the figure of Abraham Lincoln.  And, of course, those pesky vampires.

I’ll try to wrap this up on Friday, but it could drag on until next week.  In the meantime, if you have any hilarious cellphone stories, please share in a comment.  Aside from the rooster, the best ringtone I’ve heard at the library was the refrain to The Scorpions’ 80s hair-band hit, Rock You Like a Hurricane. Can you top that, Constant Readers?

Excuses: An FAQ

And just where have you been, young lady?

I’ve just returned from another one of my mini-staycations.  Notice how nobody died, and nothing caught fire.  My email is a right backlog, though – I’ve spent most of this morning cleaning it up.

Don’t you worry about becoming irrelevant in today’s fast-paced world of digital excitement?

Even we technomages have our limits.  I think it’s very important to spend periods of time away from workmail, workblogs, worktwitter, workfacebook, and, well, work, period.  I’m actually much more concerned at the moment as to whether or not I can use the word “technomage” without J. Michael Straczynski slapping a lawsuit on me.  A quick search of the Trademark Electronic Search Service (TESS) at the USPTO site indicates I’m safe, but I think he should probably call me, just so we can have a good professional discussion and clear that up.

Fair enough.  Now that you’re back at work, can you tell us why there was no August Wilson Leadership Academy post for Feburary?

Er, yes.  That.  I chose to spend my time differently last month.

But it was such a good idea!

I know.

And you promised!

I know!  I hang my head in shame.

So, when will we see the next installment?

When I read something that inspires me.  It’s not looking hopeful.  I’ve been reading a lot of leadership material, and, well…

Well what?

It’s kind of depressing.

Seriously?

Yes.

Why?

Reasons vary.  Some books are heavy on the inspiration, light on the practical implementation.  Others are crammed with bullet points, suggestions and tips to the point where it’s overwhelming.  And don’t even get me started on “management parables.” 

Well, why don’t you talk about that, then?

No can do.  Much like Booklist, Alchemy only gives positive reviews.

Where’s the fun in that?

Hey, nobody tries to write a bad book.  Even Stephanie Meyer had good, albeit sparkly, intentions.

You know where those lead, right?

Right.

So, how have you been choosing to spend your time?

Workwise, it’s still all about the databases:  making sure they’re working properly, troubleshooting them when they’re not, promoting/marketing them, gathering statistics, trying to see if all the vendors can deliver said statistics in the new format certain parties want, running trials, giving meetings, taking notes, and trying to stay on top of / manage the ongoing POWER library situation.

Zzzzzzzz….

Hey, you asked!

Sorry.

It’s not very exciting, I know.   So much library work takes place behind the scenes, and is difficult to talk about in an exciting way.  This is why I usually philosophize rather than talk about what I’m doing.  I’ll gladly change my position on this if I suddenly get an outpouring of comments begging to hear more about the intricacies of einetwork database statistics collection.

Er, pass.  Are you working on anything exciting at the moment?

When I’m not managing the electronic resources, I’m still doing everything else I usually do:  buying books, fussing over Eleventh Stack and CLPicks, staffing virtual reference and — once in a blue moon — working at the physical reference desk. 

What’s your favorite workday responsibility?

Of all the tasks on my to-do list, coordinating Eleventh Stack is still my favorite.  Serving as team leader/editor is fun and educational, and I’m both surprised and pleased that our library’s blog has passed its second birthday without a drop in quality or quantity.  Credit for that goes to my amazing team, of course.

So, you’re not at the reference desk much these days.  How do you feel about that?

Truthfully, I would like more time at the physical reference desk.  However, there will be plenty of time for that when my countywide committee responsibilities end in 2011.  I think it’s really important to try as many things as you can; even if you find out that certain kinds of library work are not to your liking or skill set, you can still learn from them.  And I’m certainly not sorry for the opportunity to get to know my peers out in the county — it’s led to a number of opportunities I wouldn’t have otherwise had, and I have a better picture of the Pittsburgh’s public library landscape than I did previously.

That’s a lot of p-sounds in a sentence.

That’s technically not a question.

Sorry.  Read any good books lately?

I thought you’d never ask.  Under the umbrella of professional reading, I’m currently swooning over The Late Age of Print, which nimbly vaults over the “print vs. digital” dilemma by examining the print book as a consumer product / cultural artifact. On the religion/spirituality tip, I’ve got Without Buddha I Could Not Be A Christian (vocabulary and diction geared toward the divinity school set) and Bring Me the Rhinoceros (more layman-friendly).   Fictionwise, I’m in slack-jawed awe of American Salvage, a collection of tight, well-constructed stories about uncomfortable subjects, and Every Last Drop, the fourth installment of the Joe Pitt Chronicles, a series designed expressly for folks who appreciate the hard-boiled qualities of Chandler and Hammett, New York stories, and — are you sensing a theme, here? — non-sparkly vampires.

 I’ve also got Writing and Publishing: The Librarian’s Handbook checked out, but I’m a little nervous about opening it. 

Why?   It sounds great!

It does!  Problem is, I have a feeling it will blow any other excuses I have for not writing into smithereens.

And that’s bad because….?

Because facing up to the truth about yourself, your gifts and abilities, and the way you can best serve the profession, and then getting over your fears and excuses, is one of the scariest things you can do throughout your career.  And it’s not like you do it once and you’re done with the process:  if you’re growing as a professional, you are constantly surveying the landscape, looking at where you are now, as well as where you would like to be.

Where would you like to be?

That’s the kicker:  I thought I knew.  Now everything ‘s up for grabs again.  This is very scary, but also delightful.

In what way?

Well, when you stop growing and learning, you might as well hang it up.  And I’m afraid you lot are stuck with me for quite some time.

All righty then.  Anything else to report?

I’ve just finished and turned in another book review.  Book reviewing knocks me out, and I’d love to do more of it, so I’m currently scouting out more opportunities there. 

I’ve also just been selected for the third cohort of the CLP Leadership Institute, a training program for Carnegie Library staff under the auspices of the Laura Bush 21st Century Librarian grant we received.  I’m hoping this means I’ll be exposed to a better quality of leadership literature; it definitely means a lot more meetings and seminars in my future, though, which brings us back to the problem of making more time to write for Alchemy.

So, what are you going to do about that?

I have a few ideas.  I seem to work better with structure and guidelines, so I’m looking for a writing template that will be both on-topic and regular.  Heaven help us all, I also have an idea for a completely separate library blog, and am quietly making my pitch to parties I suspect might be interested in collaborating on it.  If that takes off, it will debut near the end of April, and will serve to complement the kinds of things I like to discuss, but can’t always make time for.  It will also, I hope, fill an as-yet-unfilled niche in library world.

And that is…?

You’ll just have to rest in the mystery a little while longer.

Fair enough.  How are you going to spend the rest of your day?

I have one hour in which to take things that are currently on my desk and do whatever it takes to get them off of my desk and finished.  I will then spend the last two hours of my day on AskHere PA.

Do you like working virtual reference?

I absolutely love it.  Disdained by some, virtual reference is actually a key service these days, primarily because the quality and type of the questions received simply cries out for informed professionals who are skillful at ready-reference, information literacy, bibliographic instruction, and good writing/communication skills.  A healthy dose of compassion certainly doesn’t hurt either. 

Can you send us off with a video?

Ask and get.  Here’s a clip from a British band called The Heavy, whose performance on David Letterman was simply splendid.  If you enjoy old-school soul, but appreciate contemporary twists, you’d do well to watch this clip, and then run — not walk — to pick up The House That Dirt Built.

Woah!  Dancing skeletons!  That’s, er, not very professional.

Probably not in the conventional sense.  Remember, though:  Alchemy’s all about balance and fun along with all those high standards.  See also “not forgetting you’re a human being with human needs” and “regular rock out breaks.”

Well, that was…very Alchemy.

Thanks!  Tune in next time for a little less fun, but a lot more professional philosophy, probably early next week.

10 Things Currently Making Me Happy

Wait, what?  Who are you, and what have you done with our melancholy alchemist?

Fret not.  I’m as harried and hectic as ever, as you might have guessed from the long pause since my last entry.  And, to be perfectly honest, goat farming is starting to look good again.  I’ve applied for an internship at a local farm, and will keep you posted. :)

But!  I promised you a happiness list, and I always keep my promises.  My definition of “happy” tends to be slightly eccentric, though.  I wouldn’t say I’m only happy when it rains (that’s just garbage), but I’m decidedly neither cheery nor sunny in the conventional sense.  This is because, like Eric Wilson and Barbara Ehrenreich, I believe we ignore our shadowy aspects, and the gifts they can bring, at our collective peril.

All that being said, here’s my list.

#1.  The interrobang

Punctuation for the 21st century!!.  How can you possibly look at that and not smile?

#2.  The Pixies

This is the most accessible tune I could think of to post – some of you might actually remember when it was first released.  But if you plunge more deeply into the YouTubes, you’ll find all sorts of other melancholy goodness from this talented group.

#3.  Ferrets Dancing to Weezer

No explanation necessary, really.

#4.  Zebra finches rocking out

Contemporary art = really cool.

#5.  Jaron Lanier’s You Are Not A Gadget.

Have you ever hugged a book? Because I have. Lanier’s cautionary tale about the limits of Web 2.0, and his problems with its infrastructure, is something I’d love to see librarians read and respond to.

#6.  I’m not the only person who feels that way about #5.

Jessamyn West explains it all for you. Includes an interview with Lanier. Bookcrush! Authorcrush! Prominent Librarian Crush! What are you waiting for? Go read it!

#7.  Charlie Huston’s “Joe Pitt” novels.

Like Pulp Fiction, with vampires.  PS:  They definitely don’t sparkle.  Also, a romantic subplot designed for us cynical-romantics.  Start with Already Dead.

#8.  Steampunk Dice.

For the gamer who has everything. Valentine’s Day draws apace. I’m just saying.

#9.  Witty T-shirts.

Exhibit A. See also. It only hurts when I laugh.

#10.  Book Challenges

No, not like that.  The kind where you sign up to read 50, 100, or some other quantity of books in a specific time period.

I’ve signed up for challenges at Goodreads and Every Girl Blog, but I want to single out a wonderful challenge I just stumbled upon: The GLBT Challenge.  Not only is it a laudable idea, but it’s organized in such a way that you can participate as much or as little as you like.  In fact, it’s insanely manageable, even if you’re already challenged up to your eyeballs.  Click on over and take a peek.  January may be behind us, but Feburary has just begun…

So, there you have it.  I’ll not compel you to go and do likewise, but if you’d care to leave a comment, I’d love to know:  what’s making you happy right now?

January AWLA (PP) Pick: Fierce Leadership

I’m finally ready to get cracking on this project!  Of course, in the interim, I’ve had a number of experiences that have really challenged my views of leadership.  Stay tuned for posts called “Middle Marching” and “Hepburn v. Hepburn:  Leader or Change Agent?”, as well as a sidebar on following and followers.

For now, though, I’m delivering on my promise with the January pick of the August Wilson Leadership Academy (Patent Pending):  Susan Scott’s Fierce Leadership.

Summary

Scott’s introduction outlines her philosophy/methodology, then includes a section in which she defines “fierce.”  This is both useful and important, as it lets the reader know right from the get-go what s/he’s in for.  The concept of “squid eye” as an analytical tool is introduced – “squid eye” is analogous to what we here at Alchemy refer to as “calling shenanigans”; it is both an important tool in Scott’s repetoire, and the most delightful phraseology I’ve encountered in a book since kicking back with Jill Conner Browne.

The bulk of the text is devoted to six “Fierce Practices,” as follows:

  • 365 face-to-face feedback
  • Hiring for “smart + heart”
  • Modeling accountability and holding people able
  • Actually engaging employees
  • Customer connectivity
  • Radical transparency

For each practice, Scott explains what it is and compares it to “business as usual” in organizations, then demonstrates how the fierce practice can trump it.  Specific questions you can use to apply “squid eye” to your own organization are provided, and sections called “Taking it to the Organization” and “Personal Action Plan” give the reader the tools to apply the practice in concrete fashion.

Scott’s book ends with an exceptionally poetic conclusion and a list of recommended readings which, while short, decidedly emphasizes quality over quantity.

Rhetoric

This book will appeal to you if you have both a poetic soul and a pragmatic outlook; Scott draws heavily on literary, poetic, and diverse spiritual principles to make her points.  She also has a no-nonsense, earthy sense of humor that had this reviewer rolling in the aisles at times.   Books like Scott’s deliver the best of both worlds:  enough inspiration to appeal to folks who lead from the heart, paired with  enough pragmatism and tough-love sensibility to reassure the cynical that they’re for real.

 Recommended for 

 Librarians who despair at times over the challenges in their organizations, but haven’t given up hope that things could be changed for the better.

Drawbacks

  The only fault I could find with this book is that if you haven’t read Scott’s first book, Fierce Conversations, you may find yourself lost at times, or perhaps not getting the full extent of what’s offered in Fierce Leadership. While Scott does her best to make connections between the two books, reading one is decidedly a pre-requisite to reading the other. Had I known this, I might not have chosen it for AWLA (PP), but its merits more than make up for this one teensy deficit. And now you know which order to read them in, so my work here is done. :) I’ll be nabbing Fierce Conversations for myself ASAP.

Discussion/Analysis

Despite my efforts to remain detached, I have to admit that I’m really fond of this book, and think it should be used in leadership training for librarians.  The concepts of fierce conversations and squid eye directly address the biggest problem I think our profession has:  an inclination towards public displays of passive-aggressive behavior.

In case you hadn’t noticed, there’s quite a bit of change going on the profession right now.  Some folks fear it; others embrace it.  Regrettably, however, few people in either camp have demonstrated the ability to communicate constructively outside of their own belief circle. It drives me bananas to read about librarians slagging on each other in anonymous blogs and blog comments, and/or sending anonymous tips about “horrible” things other libraries and librarians are doing. Academic librarians diss public librarians, and vice versa. Adult librarians look down on YA librarians, and vice versa. School librarians, medical librarians, and corporate librarians get little to no love, except from other medical, corporate, and school librarians. Very rarely do I actually see an attempt to build bridges and actually communicate.

This makes no sense to me. Do pediatricians sit around talking smack on plastic surgeons? Do tax law specialists blog anonymously about public defenders? Only in librarianship does there seem to be a so-called “professional” community that sometimes behaves like anything but.

[NB: I am open to the possibility that I am simply looking in the wrong places and reading the wrong things. Given that reason and critical thinking are not as "sexy" as anonymous slagging, and harder to find, it's possible there are people out there working for the greater good who simply aren't getting the attention they deserve. Somebody, please, prove me wrong, and provide some links.]

At the organizational level, what I see and hear time and time again is that there’s all this stuff going wrong, but we can’t do anything about it because we’re just little people who have no power.  Worse, when there are attempts to change the status quo, they usually involve creating “us vs. them” divides, in which some folks in the organization are cast as villains, and the perception is put about that if “those folks” would just retire, leave, or get a clue, we would have a happy-sunshine-rainbow-land where everything worked perfectly.

After watching all of this for about seven years now, I call shenanigans, er, squid eye, on the whole kit and kaboodle.

I understand where it comes from, though, mostly because I’m no better than anyone else in this regard when the conversations have the potential to get fierce.  Ferocity, as Scott lays it out, is uncomfortable.  It’s scary as hell.  It doesn’t feel good to have to go to somebody and tell them something they probably don’t want to hear.  It doesn’t feel good to have people angry with you because you spoke your truth.  And it’s lonely, sometimes, to be the person who disagrees with the crowd, even if you know in your heart you’re being true to yourself, and couldn’t just go along to get along if you wanted to.

It’s easier, sometimes, to blog anonymously, or comment anonymously, than to put your name on something and stand behind it, devil take the consequences.  It’s easier to talk about people behind their backs than it is to try to build bridges with them, or tell them to their faces why they’ve upset you.  What’s even worse is that it’s easier to stay silent than it is to do any of those things.

It’s easier to hire the person who fits in with the organization, rather than the person who could move you forward if you gave him/her a chance.  It’s easier to blame other people for what’s going wrong than to examine your conscience and see how you might have contributed to the problem through your own behavior.  It’s easier to write off your problem patrons, your middle and/or upper management, or your disgruntled employees rather than making the time to get to the root of their issues and see what can be healed.  And don’t even get me started on “radical transparency”:  for as much as we bandy that about in library science, I suspect that many of us simply aren’t ready for it.

But I think we could change.

And, ultimately, belief is at the root of ferocity.  Scott makes it very clear that you don’t have to believe what she believes, but you sure as hell need to believe in something.  For librarians, this is doubly important.  We are not corporate, in the sense that what we do is not about engendering profits.  Success, in our realm, is measured in lives changed, via refdesk ticks, the number of people at our programs, the number of database accesses, etc.  Those metrics speak to supporting democracy and transforming society.  We are the luckiest freaking people on the planet, because we don’t just crank out widgets.  We don’t pollute the environment, either – in fact, whenever we do our jobs, the world is generally a better place than we found it.

So why don’t we act like it more often?

Think about your library for just a minute.  Think about how awesome it could be if, in the popular parlance, people stopped being polite and started being real.  Think about how much more the profession would rock if we actually started reaching out to people who were different from us, and engaged them in frank talk and creative solutions, instead of pitching attitude, calling names, and creating “just like us” enclaves where no ideas ever threatened our view of what libraries should be like.

Did that upset you?  Raise your hackles, perhaps?  Good.  If the shoe fits, you should probably buy it in as many colors as you can.  And if you decide you don’t like those shoes, then maybe it’s time to start shopping for different shoes.

Don’t worry.  I’m looking at myself just as closely, because, as Scott observes repeatedly throughout Fierce Conversations, the best way to create change and rock an organization is to look at yourself, and where you fall short, and start there.  Indeed, it is the only place to start.  If I had a dollar for every time I’ve failed to be the person I know I could be, I could buy you all a copy of the book…but I believe I could learn from my mistakes and move foward.

I mean, let’s face it: who am I? I’m an ordinary librarian in an ordinary community. I’m not a role model. I’m not a “famous librarian” (and, quite frankly, unless your name is Nancy Pearl or Casanova, neither are you). I’m a lovably flawed human being who wants to improve, and would like us to at least be able to talk about all this stuff honestly. In other words, I’m probably just like you. But though I be but little, I be fierce.

Who’s with me?

Resources

I love companion websites, and I love authors who give away freebies.  Visit Fierce Leadership to get some goodies from Scott, sign up for her newsletter, learn more about her company, and watch a short video that nails the gist of her philosophy/practices.

There you have it. Once Feburary’s AWLA (PP) pick is ready, I’ll create the AWLA (PP) page with January’s post archive, and a list of suggested companion readings and questions to ask yourself. And if I haven’t upset anybody with this column, then I probably did it wrong.

Take care, and I’ll be back soon.

Here Comes the Sun (And Some Presents)!

A somewhat grammatically incorrect subject header, but we’ll let it slide just this once.  There are, after all, presents to be handed out.

Via various blogs and colleagues, I spotted Seth Godin’s holiday gift to everybody, the free e-book What Matters Now, which you can download here.  In the spirit of holiday sharing, I thought I’d do something similar; since the chances are good I won’t be publishing a book anytime soon, though, I decided to dip into my stash of useful/fun freebies and do a little sharing.  So, without further ado, I give you…

Random Days of Alchemy

One ARC for one lucky reader

There’s an ARC on my desk, and it would like a good home. If you leave a comment on this entry between now and December 28, 2009, you’ll be in the running to receive it. Just to make it interesting, I’m not going to tell you what it is – I will, however, paraphrase from the jacket blurb and say that it’s a Jodi Picoult-type story written in an Alice Munro-type style. So if literary fiction is your thing, and your curiosity is piqued, comment away!

6 Blogs I’m Reading

Here’s a short list of some non-library blogs that help keep me within acceptable bounds of crazy sane.  This, I would argue, makes me a better librarian, in the long run.

Issa’s Untidy Hut.  If you enjoy poetry, and, in particular, haiku, you should take a peek at the companion blog to the small-press magazine Lilliput Review.  IUH just received a tip of the hat as a “best poetry blog” at Suite 101, so don’t just take my word for it.

Vegan Hope. Although I am not vegan, I have definitely gone from “vegetarian” to “lower-dairy vegetarian” after reading this chronicle of one woman’s journey back to health via a vegan diet. This blog is both inspirational and useful, with many giveaways, and a “recipe Fridays” feature that is too delicious to be believed.  People of all food persuasions should take a peek.

Coilhouse bills itself as “a love letter to alternative culture,” and delivers on its promise. Edgy art and videos appear frequently, and I always learn something fun and unusual when I read it. Not always safe for work, but definitely an add to your newsreader if you’re into contemporary alternative culture.

Zen Habits, oft-cited here at Alchemy, is the one blog a stressed-out librarian can’t do without. It’s an oasis of calm and gentle in a sea of drama and meh, and its advice can definitely help if you’re in need of some tips about organization, simplifying, de-stressing, or work-life balance.

LitDrift: Storytelling in the 21st Century is a writing blog I discovered very recently while tooling around the web, following up leads from my “portable MFA” class. I haven’t been following it very long, but the essays are definitely interesting, and worth keeping an eye on. Oh, and they give away a book every Friday. Score!

Last, but certainly not least, AverageCats, the cat blog for those who find LOLcats utterly too twee.   LOLcat photos are re-captioned to point out just how mundane the cat behavior or situation actually is.  The wry understatement is, quite frankly, hilarious, so if you’ve overdosed on cute cats and need a palate cleanser, you might enjoy this blog.

3 Cool Websites

I love cool, fun, useful websites.  Here are a handful of nifty things I found in 2009.  Some are new, while others are “new-to-me.”  All are nifty, in their own way.  Observe.

CatHelp Online: Feline Emergency. I know, I know: it’s getting a little kitty-centric around here. However, this comprehensive list of plants that are poisonous to felines just might come in handy at the reference desk someday.

CitySounds FM. Quite possibly the best free streaming music site ever, CitySounds allows you to check out what’s popular in cities worldwide, as determined by contributing users, and listen live from your computer. They’ve also got an iPhone app, so you can take the musical goodness on the road. This site skews heavily toward techno, house, and other dance formats, but there are interesting surprises to be found. Choose the “Random City” feature to take a world tour of goodness while you work.

Wize, a metasearch site for product reviews. In addition to a simple search box, you can search by product, need, or product/need combined. If you don’t have Consumer Reports handy, and/or don’t want to surf all over looking for product reviews, this might be a good place to start. I especially like the use of tags here – tags normally make me impatient, but they’re used here to good effect.

2 crazy project ideas

Looking for something out-of-the-box to try in 2010? These two online projects could be the creative whack in the head you’re looking for…

The Happiness Project is the companion website to a soon-to-be published book by the same name. Resources include the 2010 Happiness Challenge, a DIY program for boosting your happiness quotient.

In the same vein, but broader in scope, we have One Hundred Days to Make Me a Better Person. Pick a thing, any thing. Do it for 100 days, any 100 days of the year you want. Write/post about it. Structure + flexibility = genius.

2 more book/website pairings

Like wine and cheese, the notion of books and companion websites appears to have taken off. Here are two interesting ones I’ve been perusing lately.

Rules for Renegades, Christine Comaford. Written in a scrappy, tough-love style, Comaford offers business and career inspiration without falling prey to the pitfall of sappy rhetoric. Though geared to for-profit go-getters, non-profit employees will definitely take much away from this book, especially in terms of setting personal goals and planning one’s future. Upon free registration, you’ll also have access to a series of worksheets, which is always great fun if, like me, you’re a big fan of a) free, and b) worksheets!

Ambition is Not a Dirty Word is the companion website to Debra Condren’s AmBITCHous, and while this one’s specifically geared toward women, you could argue that it’s the women amongst library folk who need it: learn how to stop feeling guilty about your desire to succeed professionally, get over the notion of being universally liked, and stop putting your light under a bushel. Relentlessly pink, Condren’s book and website might turn off folks who feel squeamish about language or pastels. Nevertheless, it’s a dose of advice that’s sorely needed in a profession where passive-aggression can rule the day, and there are more free resources to ponder, to boot.

And finally…

1 Fun Video

Come on. You didn’t think I was going to skip the opportunity to lead you in a sing-along, now, did you? :)

Whatever holidays you celebrate, I hope they’re splendid ones. I’m going to try to finish a bunch of things before my Christmas break, so we’ll talk again next week.

The August Wilson Leadership Academy (Patent Pending)

Previously-scheduled train of thought sidelined by a random idea!

I believe in fair wages for all.  I also believe that folks who are in business for themselves have the right to decide for themselves just what constitutes “fair” and charge for their services accordingly.  My blue-collar roots rankle, however, whenever I get a catalog that pitches leadership seminars for $1200 a pop, not including transportation / accommodation costs.

And it’s not because I begrudge them one iota.  Nope.  Successful people inspire me, because if they can achieve their dreams–often despite major hardships–then I pretty much have no excuse, given the relative privileges and advantages I possess.  However, narrowing the gap between where I am (namely, unable to afford a $1200 seminar) and where I would like to be (able to afford the $1200 seminar but doing something else with that money instead) is what proves tricky.

Ergo, while leafing through Yet Another Pricey Catalog and muttering invective under my breath, I decided that what I’ve now come to call the August Wilson Rule applies just as much to leadershp as it does to anything else in life:  if you can’t afford it, use the library.

I’ve sung Mr. Wilson’s praises before, but here’s a quick summary for those of you who haven’t heard that particular tune:  while attending a Pittsburgh high school, playwright August Wilson was unjustly accused of plagiarism.  As a result, he dropped out of school and decided to educate himself at the Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh.  He came in every day and got himself a world-class education with our collection, and for his efforts he received a diploma.  Currently, he is the only person in the world with an educational credential from CLP.

I’d like to be #2, but let’s not get carried away here.  At least, not just yet.

Okay, let’s get just a little bit carried away, shall we?  Here’s something I’ll try in 2010 to see how it works out:  I will read at least one current book on leadership every month, and review it here at Alchemy.  Then I’ll add it to a page called “The August Wilson Leadership Academy (Patent Pending)” so that you’ll be able to skim the list and see whether or not it would be a good fit for your own lifelong learning endeavors.

And just to make it interesting, I’m not going to necessarily pick the books on library leadership.  Nope.  We’re a little odd here at Alchemy, with our strange notions about trying to incorporate what’s useful from the Outside World into library practice.  Besides, there are plenty of other bloggers reviewing the library literature – it will be much more fun for me to try to critically analyze the larger body of leadership writings and try to separate the wheat from the chaff for my peers.

I know, I know – I have some strange ideas about what constitutes a good time.  My girlfiends and I are working on that one, I assure you.

Let me know what you think – I have a couple of drafts in the hopper, so we will hopefully get back to the other things I wanted to talk about before year’s end.  I also had another smashing idea for 2010 that I want to run by you before I vanish for my long New Year’s vacation (I actually forgot to take my three floating holidays this year – somebody, please, save me from myself!).

Tonight is the library board meeting in which the fate of the branches are decided, so I suppose it would make sense to talk about the big white elephant next, once the dust clears.  Stay tuned.

Booked up

Literally AND metaphorically.  This past week has been the usual blend of alchemical-wonderful, but there’s also been a lot of reading going on.

I review for both LJ and the SRRT newsletter, which is an interesting exercise in contrasts.  LJ’s short, severe 175-word limit forces me to be specific, whereas with SRRT’s 500-word relative ramble, I can be a bit more poetic about a book. For LJ I review fiction, which guarantees my degrees in English and the time spent learning how to read a text critically will never go to waste; it also really forces me to think about library budgets, appeal factors, etc. and make sure my review gets packed with the sort of helpful details a selector in a hurry might need. For SRRT the focus is on non-fiction works that somehow address social concerns. This somewhat selfishly allows me to praise wonderful books I am already reading anyway, and that might not get many reviews in the professional or popular press. 

Due to an overcrowded plate, I actually just turned down a review opportunity from SRRT, which disappoints me beyond belief, because I was going to review Sarah Miles’s Take This Bread, a memoir in which a lifelong atheist with a background in political and social justice work experiences a radical conversion based on the principles of actually feeding the hungry, as opposed to just talking about it (or, heavens forbid, forming yet another committee or study group about it). If you have ever said the words “liberation theology” out loud; live or work in a community where hunger is a critical issue; belong to a faith community that would like to be more active in feeding the poor; or wonder how on earth anyone managed to reconcile faith and action in a hands-on practical way, you should read this book.

I’m still slowly making my way through that package of galleys from Rory Litwin, which is fitting given that the first book I’ll review here is all about why reading slowly is a darned good idea. You might be asking yourself, though, why we’re bothering with book reviews anyway, since newspapers are dying and nobody reads anymore, and besides, won’t Google scan it? The answers to those questions will also appear in the review. For a sneak peek at topic to come, click here.

ETA: I nearly forgot to mention that I’ve also contributed a review to Litterbox Magazine, a new local online literary journal that will go live tomorrow (I’m telling you today so you don’t think I’m joking. :) ) The book I reviewed, Literature and War, is another example of the kind of book that doesn’t get nearly enough ink, and the kind of assignment that lets a librarian fulfill his/her ethical obligations while discharging her/his professional ones.

« Older entries

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 100 other followers